I went to Vegas once with a geeky couple who brought walkie talkies so that both halves of our two-couple party could find each other when we wanted to regroup. (It was before cell phones.) So every time I was somewhere quiet enough to hear the walkie talkie, the hotel janitors were on the same frequency we were using, talking about pool filters and where Manuel was and who had the keys.
Twitter is the online equivalent of having a walkie talkie turned on all the time with however many twits you’re following all talking at the same time about where Manuel is and other such pithy topics… The inanity is mind numbing.
Now, at some point, we have all had a friend who is clearly in a downward spiral. Maybe it’s addiction, maybe it’s depression… Maybe it’s obsessive-compulsive use of Twitter.
What do you do in cases like these? How do you broach the subject in a way that will not be met with defensiveness, hurt, or anger?
I think most people just ignore the problem, in order to avoid getting one of those reactions, and hope somebody else will deal with it, or that the person in question will just snap out of it. I haven’t yet decided what I’m going to do. I’m American. We’re big enablers and, so far, that’s all I’ve been doing.
I can see how OCT (obsessive-compulsive tweeting) could be a symptom of bigger issues; an escape from pain and loneliness, for one. Twitter is a tool that could make a person feel is if he were communicating, contributing, and as if others were listening, as if they cared. He could tweet things that might make him feel important, or even just that his life had meaning. This self-imposed, pressing obligation to share important information could allow him to rationalize his neglect of his own problems. Or even to feel good because of the personal sacrifice he is making in putting his own needs second…
But tweeting is not real communication. It’s like drinking diet soda. There’s that sweet taste, but without the sugar. The brain is fooled, the body is not nourished. I’m afraid a lot of brains are being fooled with some of the toys that are out there.
An illusion of substance.
I readily admit that if you’re being bombed in Gaza, or arrested in Egypt, and have the ability and presence of mind to tweet it from your cell phone, Twitter can be an important tool, even a life-saving one. If you need information urgently, and can tweet a question to the wind and have the good fortune to get a useful answer, then it’s served a purpose.
But there is only one life I would want the blow-by-blow details of. I would be overjoyed to read “Eating tofu hot dogs for dinner and watching The Matrix again” from my 23-year-old son. Then I could picture him in his own apartment, all grown-up, existing. But then, of course, I wouldn’t want to read the “Just did my 8th shot of tequila” tweet… But he doesn’t do Twitter, so it’s not an issue.
Unfortunately, if you follow people who are of professional, but not personal interest, you still get to find out what they’re having for dinner, when their mothers are probably the only people on the planet who would give a rat’s ass.
Ironically, perhaps, I gave a talk on social media, an introduction for beginners, at the American Library in Paris the other day. My whole spiel was about how great and fun and enriching an online life, with the help of social media, can be, and I sincerely believe that.
My audience challenged me on several counts. I was asked how I found the time for all these things, asked if I felt I had control of my life, or if they were controlling me. Things like that. I had no trouble answering. It’s all a question of moderation, and knowing to use the tools that serve a purpose (practical or impractical) in your life, to use them in a way that does not make them more disruptive than not, to use them only as part of a balanced diet of real, meaningful, life.
Another audience member told me not to give up on Twitter yet (because I said I hated it). I won’t. I’ll keep my account because I have to, for my work. And because I’m curious (about the phenomenon, not that somebody had two cavities). And I like to watch society change before my very eyes.
Although with Twitter, it’s more like watching society change its underwear before your eyes…
As for my friend with the problem, I think the best thing I can do is stop enabling him. I’m going to have to do the tough love thing and unfollow him. Wish me luck.
I’m really not getting twitter, but honestly keep going back to it just so I can see if I can ‘get’ what I’m missing.
I was on twitter for the inauguration, and THAT was actually fun and interesting… I think for the first time I really enjoyed myself, what with all the woots, the imediate reaction on Aretha’s hat and the like… it truly was fun.
Oh, and of course, we’re all back to ‘boring’ since. I just tweeted about having a little dog lick my inner ear. Exciting, eh?
Hi Sassy.
You know, I’m convinced the difference is knowing the people you follow. For some reason when I read things like that from people I know, like you, I don’t get annoyed.
Maybe we need to have an option to receive pro and/or personal tweets from people we follow, and to classify ours as such when we tweet them. Of course, the line blurs for people like geeks whose tweets about software are probably as much for fun as for work… I just don’t see it working for me.
But we shall see…
:-)
And I was watching various Twitter feeds election night and after dozens of people announced Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio Obama wins Ohio, it got a little old.
(Vincent says you’re one of the rare people he follows who knows how to write.)
We want to keep hearing about the ear licking and so on, trust me.
What gets to me the most, isn’t the people just plugging their blog posts (I do it occasionally), it’s all the people tweeting about tweeting and how to tweet about tweeting about tweeting.
I went through a phase where I would follow more and more people, including some I like (from blogs or IRL) and then through a second phase where I started “unfollowing” more and more people.
In the end, my ideal Twitter list would probably be the people I have in my different IM apps (except most of them (wisely) don’t tweet)…
And yes, sassy/eye heart Internet, you’re probably the person most responsible for my not quitting Twitter completely (yet). Your stuff rarely fails to crack me up.
Oh, and I forgot the serial-tweeters who post a tweet-a-minute. So rude. They’re the first I learned to unfollow.
You guys are sweet ! (blushing)
Maybe it’s a personality thing… I notice that in ‘real life’ I don’t have that much in common with many people, and sometimes I think it’s those same people on Twitter that I don’t enjoy following. Still, I think the quest for fun/interesting/witty/whateverfloatsmyboat kind of people is what keeps me coming back. Oh, that, and I’m easily entertained.
As for ‘unfollowing’? I personally believe it’s the sign of a healthy Twitter discernment. (;
Hi Sassy.
Even if we have nothing in common, we want to meet you before you leave France… If you are still leaving. Or even if you’re not. Next time you’re in Paris for a bathroom fixture show or whatever the hell it was…
The quest for fun/witty etc. on Twitter. So you like bobbing for apples in the ocean?
Yes Pam, but all that aside, do you LIKE Twitter?
Sorry, couldn’t resist. I think I have pretty much given up. One problem it seems to me is the significance test. Is what I am about to do of significance/interest to anyone else? Or is the whole point that it isn’t, that Marcel Proust, alive now, would have been a Twitter addict, recording every Madeleine eaten for the edification of his followers? Caught hopelessly between twitters from 350.org about the fate of the planet, and from another extreme twitterer who tells me every time he gets on a train, I totter hopelessly wondering whether to twit or not to twit. That is clearly the question.
Hi David!
I don’t not like Twitter. Twitter will find its way, and I can see it serving many purposes, practical and impractical.
Maybe society will get over it and people will stop thinking they need to follow ALL people in the hope of getting something useful or beautiful out of it (Sassy’s comment above). Maybe they will start to follow the people who matter to them in the first place, or who they are inclined to suspect might have something useful or beautiful to say. I would have followed John Updike, for example. But there’s not a lot of that around… Vincent and I like following eyehrtinternet. Something about her voice and her way of seeing. But I knew that from her blog before Twitter.
As I said, I like watching the phenomenon. The world is getting curiouser and curiouser.
I agree with what you say about Twitter and have seen the obsession take over. It also seems very cliquey and if you’re not in the clique and don’t understand all the jargon then it can be a very alienating online tool.
It is also full of predatory and opportunistic spammers and sellers in my experience. People can follow me all they want but I’m not talking anymore on Twitter.
Hi Susan.
As I suggested in an earlier comment, I think it’s just in a state of chaos because it’s so new. I do think it will settle down and become more meaningful. I think eventually real communities based on interests and other ties, actual and virtual, will emerge, and the randomness will subside. I hope so at least!
I’ve noticed one guy who seems to be determined to follow and talk to absolutely everybody on Twitter. He must have no time for anything else!
Thanks for your comment. Nice to meet you!